Scrums.com logomark
SovTech is now Scrums.com! Same company, new name.
SovTech is now Scrums.com!!
Read more here

Why Outsourcing Is More Cost-Effective Than In-House Teams

Discover how OUTSOURCING SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT can save costs compared to hiring in-house developers, providing flexibility, expertise, and faster ROI.

Scrums.com Team
February 11, 2025
Blog cover image

Introduction

When evaluating software development options, many businesses choose to hire an in-house team or outsource to an expert software development company. One of the most common objections we encounter is that outsourcing seems expensive compared to hiring an in-house team. At first glance, the higher rates may appear to outweigh the benefits of going external. However, this perception misses the bigger picture, especially considering the total cost of ownership, efficiency, and long-term scalability. Let’s dive deeper into why outsourcing is often the more cost-effective choice.

1. The True Cost of In-House Teams

Hiring an in-house team involves more than just their salary. While a developer’s hourly rate may seem reasonable, businesses need to factor in additional costs, including:

  • Recruitment Fees: Hiring the right developers requires significant time and resources. The average cost of hiring a developer (job ads, recruitment agencies, interviews) can run upwards of $5,000 to $15,000.
  • Training and Onboarding: Once you hire the right candidate, there are still training costs involved, along with time spent getting them up to speed on your project, company processes, and tools.
  • Employee Benefits: In-house teams require full-time benefits such as health insurance, paid time off, retirement plans, and other perks, which can add 20-30% to their overall compensation package.
  • Office Space and Equipment: Beyond the salary, maintaining an in-house team involves office space, equipment, software licenses, and other infrastructure costs that can increase the overall expense of employing a team.

Scrums.com helps you avoid these hidden costs. With no need for recruitment or onboarding, you can get started immediately and avoid the overhead associated with hiring full-time employees.

2. Flexibility and Scalability: Pay for What You Need

Unlike an in-house team, which requires long-term commitments, an outsourced development team is flexible. This means you can scale up or down based on your project needs. Scrums.com offers the flexibility to bring in additional experts when you need them, whether it’s for a short-term project or long-term support.

This scalability prevents the underutilization of resources, a common problem with in-house teams. When you need fewer developers or specific expertise, outsourcing allows you to adjust without incurring unnecessary costs.

Scrums.com makes this process seamless, so you’re never stuck paying for resources you don't need.

3. Speeding Up Time-to-Market = Faster ROI

One of the most significant benefits of outsourcing is time-to-market. Scrums.com’s expert teams are ready to start immediately, while an in-house team needs to be recruited, onboarded, and trained—taking months before they can contribute effectively.

The faster you get your product into the market, the sooner you start generating returns. The Scrums.com model helps you minimize delays and deliver high-quality solutions more quickly, which can result in a faster ROI.

Moreover, our experts are already familiar with the best practices, frameworks, and tools for developing software, ensuring quality from day one.

4. Expertise Without the Long-Term Commitment

Hiring an in-house team means committing to their employment long-term, whether or not you need them. By contrast, Scrums.com offers on-demand expertise, allowing you to work with the best developers in the field without long-term employment obligations.

Whether you need expertise in blockchain, AI, or web development, we can provide highly skilled developers with the right technical expertise to meet your project’s needs.

With Scrums.com, you get access to specialized expertise for a fraction of the cost of hiring full-time employees, ensuring that your project has the talent it needs without the overhead.

5. The Total Cost Savings of Outsourcing

Outsourcing is often the more cost-effective choice when you add up the total cost of ownership for an in-house team—salaries, recruitment, training, benefits, office space, and other overhead costs.

Scrums.com provides tailored solutions that match your business needs, all while reducing overhead costs, enhancing scalability, and offering you access to highly skilled developers ready to deliver on time.

Conclusion

While hiring in-house developers may seem like a more affordable option initially, outsourcing with Scrums.com often proves to be a more cost-effective and flexible solution when you factor in all the hidden costs and long-term commitments. By choosing Scrums.com, you can scale your team as needed, leverage our specialized expertise, and ensure faster time-to-market—all without the added overhead costs of in-house teams.

If you're ready to learn more about how outsourcing can save your business time and money, contact Scrums.com today and explore how we can support your software development needs.

As seen on FOX, Digital journal, NCN, Market Watch, Bezinga and more
Scale Your Development Team
Faster With Scrums.com
Get in touch and let's get started
Book a Demo
Tick
Cost-effective
Tick
Reliable
Tick
Scalable